CASE STUDIES
Featuring: SaaS Company
Champions Loved the Product. Deals Still Stalled.
How one SaaS founder closed 3 stalled deals
in 60 days by equipping champions to navigate
buying committee dynamics
Confidential Engagement: This client requested anonymity under NDA. Industry, revenue range, and timeline are accurate. Identifying details have been changed to protect confidentiality while preserving the problem, diagnostic approach, and transformation.
Strong product interest. Champions engaged. Meetings happening consistently.
But deals kept stalling at the decision stage.
Champions wanted the product. They’d advocate internally, submit requests, champion the value—then deals would disappear into committee review and never resurface.
Other priorities got funded. This one kept getting pushed. Quarters would pass with “we’re still working on approval.”
The founder was doing everything right with champions. Deep discovery. Tailored demos. Clear value articulation.
But champions couldn’t get clarity on how to get their ask approved. And the founder was speaking entirely to what champions cared about—which was completely different from what economic buyers needed to prioritize the spend.
the problem
When You're Selling to the Wrong Buyer
The founder had built strong relationships with champions. Product people. Technical leads. Department heads who would use the solution daily.
These champions loved the product. Saw the value immediately. Got excited in demos. Wanted to move forward.
But they weren’t the decision-makers.
When it came time to get budget approved, champions would hit a wall:
- Other initiatives got prioritized
- Budget went to “more critical” projects
- Requests sat in limbo for months
- Deals that felt close just went quiet
The founder would follow up with champions: “What’s the status?”
Champions would respond: “Still working on getting it approved internally. There are a lot of competing priorities.”
The invisible problem:
The founder was tailoring every conversation to what the champion cared about—features, functionality, ease of use, team adoption.
But economic buyers (VPs, CFOs, budget holders) weren’t evaluating based on those criteria. They were asking:
- Why does this matter more than other requests?
- What’s the business case?
- What happens if we don’t do this?
- How does this compare to other ways we could spend this budget?
Champions couldn’t answer those questions because the founder had never equipped them with that business case. The conversations had been entirely feature and use-case focused.
The pattern:
Selling to champions like they’re decision-makers. Champions can influence, advocate, and champion internally—but they can’t prioritize budget without economic buyer’s language and justification.
If you only speak to what champions care about, economic buyers can’t justify the spend.
The Diagnosis
What the GTM Blueprint Revealed
The diagnostic started by mapping the buying committee and understanding what each persona actually cared about.
What did the economic buyer actually care about?
Research phase:
We identified the key personas involved in the decision:
- Champion: The user/advocate (product person, technical lead, department head)
- Economic Buyer: The budget holder (VP level or above)
- Influencers: Anyone else in the approval chain
Then we researched what each persona prioritized—not assumptions, but actual validation through interviews with similar buyers in the market.
The disconnect:
The founder’s entire sales approach was optimized for the champion. Every conversation. Every demo. Every piece of collateral.
But the champion had to sell it upward to the economic buyer—and had zero tools to do that. No business case. No economic buyer language. No ROI justification.
The result: Champions would advocate (“we really need this tool”) but couldn’t articulate why it should be prioritized over competing requests. Economic buyers would default to funding initiatives with clearer business cases.
We were so focused on making the champion happy that we never thought about what the person approving the budget actually needed to hear.
The GTM Blueprint process:
Mapped each persona in the buying committee. Researched what the economic buyer prioritized (not what the champion valued). Validated through conversations with similar buyers.
Built the business case in the economic buyer’s language:
- Strategic alignment (how this supports their public initiatives)
- Competitive positioning (what they risk if they don’t act)
- Measurable ROI (what changes in their KPIs)
- Opportunity cost (what happens if budget goes elsewhere)
The disconnect was clear: founder had mastered the champion conversation but had never built the economic buyer case.
The Shift
Equipping Champions to Navigate Committees
Building Multi-Persona GTM Framework
The GTM Blueprint work focused on enabling the founder to sell through champions to economic buyers.
What we built:
- Unique Value Proposition for Each Persona
Created distinct value propositions tailored to what each persona cared about.
Same product. Different framing for different stakeholders.
- Specific Problem Definition by Persona
Mapped the specific problems each persona was trying to solve.
This gave the founder language to connect product capabilities to what each persona cared about.
Promised Outcomes by Persona
Defined clear, measurable outcomes for each stakeholder- Business Case Template
Created a one-page business case template champions could share with economic buyers.Written entirely in economic buyer language—not features, but business outcomes.
Discovery Question Framework
Built new discovery questions to gather the insights needed to complete the business case.
These questions gave the founder the context to complete the business case template with company-specific information.
The Results
3 Deals Closed in 60 Days
BEFORE
• Champions couldn't get approval
• Months in committee limbo
• Budget went to "higher priorities"
AFTER
• Champions equipped with business case
• Economic buyer justification clear
• Same pipeline, new approach
We went from hoping champions could figure out how to get it approved to giving them exactly what they needed to make the internal case. The deals that had been stuck for months closed within weeks.
The Results
3 Deals Closed in 60 Days
BEFORE
• Champions couldn't get approval
• Months in committee limbo
• Budget went to "higher priorities"
AFTER
• Champions equipped with business case
• Economic buyer justification clear
• Same pipeline, new approach
We went from hoping champions could figure out how to get it approved to giving them exactly what they needed to make the internal case. The deals that had been stuck for months closed within weeks.
Why the transformation worked:
The founder didn’t change the product. Didn’t change the champion relationships. Didn’t start over with new pipeline.
They changed how they equipped champions to navigate buying committees.
Champions still loved the product. But now they had the language and business case to get economic buyers to prioritize it.
From hoping champions could sell it internally to systematically equipping them to do so.
Before: “Our champion is working on getting it approved.”
Now: “Our champion has the business case to get economic buyer buy-in.”
The Takeaway
When This Pattern Applies to You
If you’re seeing this pattern—champions love your product, deals feel close, but nothing closes—you might be selling to the wrong buyer.
The pattern:
You’ve mastered the champion conversation. Deep discovery. Great demos. Strong relationships with users who will benefit.
But deals stall at decision stage. Budget goes elsewhere. “We love it but can’t prioritize it right now.”
Why this is difficult:
Champions care about features, usability, daily workflow. Economic buyers care about strategic impact, measurable ROI, competitive positioning, opportunity cost.
If you only speak champion language, economic buyers can’t justify the spend—even if champions advocate for it.
The symptoms:
You can’t clearly navigate: “Who else needs to approve this?” Different conversations, unclear process.
Deals feel close for months, then die quietly. “Still working on approval” turns into “we’re going a different direction.”
When deals do close, you can’t explain why. Some champions successfully navigate committees, others can’t—feels random.
Your pipeline is full of “champions love it” deals that won’t convert.
The shift isn't just about better discovery. It's about equipping champions to sell upward in economic buyer language.
Most founders optimize for champion happiness. But champions aren’t decision-makers. If you don’t equip them to make the internal business case, deals stall—no matter how much they love your product.
The question isn't whether champions love your product.
The question is: can they get economic buyers to prioritize it?
LET'S TALK
Deals Stalling at Decision Stage?
If you have strong champion relationships but deals keep getting deprioritized, if “we’re still working on approval” turns into months of silence, if budget keeps going to “higher priorities”—the problem isn’t your champion relationships.
It’s whether you’re equipping them to navigate buying committees.
Book a free GTM Blueprint session. We’ll diagnose where deals are actually stalling and show you how to equip champions to get economic buyer buy-in.
Start With a Strategic Conversation
Book a 40-minute strategy session. I'll provide actionable recommendations on your biggest GTM challenge.